HFA Icon

MetLife Not Likely To Challenge FSOC Despite Questionable Analysis

HFA Padded
Mark Melin
Published on
Updated on
Sign up for our E-mail List and Get FREE Access to Exclusive Investment E-books and More!

The decision by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) to tag insurance company MetLife as a systematically significant institution was controversial. Now, Sterne Agee is adding fuel to a fire that will likely die out, as no further action from Met Life on the issue is expected.

In a research report today, Sterne Agee analysts John Nadel, Wesley Carmichael and Michael Ward concluded the FSOC report is “one-sided” and that it is “abundantly clear” the report “paid little attention to mitigating factors” MetLife uses to manage risk.

Regardless of the report’s reported flaws, MetLife is unlikely to take the unprecedented step of challenging the designation in court, the analysis predicted.

Metlife logo

Analyzing MetLife

MetLife...

Login required to continue reading.

Setup a free account to get access to this article (no credit card required).

View Full Article
Already a member? Log in here
HFA Padded

Mark Melin is an alternative investment practitioner whose specialty is recognizing the impact of beta market environment on a technical trading strategy. A portfolio and industry consultant, wrote or edited three books including High Performance Managed Futures (Wiley 2010) and The Chicago Board of Trade’s Handbook of Futures and Options (McGraw-Hill 2008) and taught a course at Northwestern University's executive education program.