HFA Icon

Kelly Formula and Weighting Investments [ANALYSIS]

HFA Padded
HFA Staff
Published on
Sign up for our E-mail List and Get FREE Access to Exclusive Investment E-books and More!

set S^o of optimal outcomes is not empty then the optimal fraction f^o_k to bet on k-th outcome may be calculated from this formula: f^o_k=frac{er_k - R(S^o)}{frac{D}{beta_k}}=p_k-frac{R(S^o)}{frac{D}{beta_k}}.

One may prove[13] that

R(S^o)=1-sum_{i in S^o}{f^o_i}

where the right hand-side is the reserve rate[clarification needed]. Therefore the requirement er_k=frac{D}{beta_k}p_k > R(S) may be interpreted[13] as follows: k-th outcome is included in the set S^o of optimal outcomes if and only if its expected revenue rate is greater than the reserve rate. The formula for the optimal fraction f^o_k may be interpreted as the excess of the expected revenue rate of k-th horse over the reserve rate divided by the revenue after deduction of the track take when k-th horse wins or as the excess of the probability of k-th horse winning over the reserve rate divided by revenue after deduction of the track take when k-th horse wins. The binary growth exponent is

G^o=sum_{i in S}{p_ilog_2{(er_i)}}+(1-sum_{i in S}{p_i})log_2{(R(S^o))} ,

and the doubling time is

T_d=frac{1}{G^o}.

This method of selection of optimal bets may be applied also when probabilities p_k are known only for several most promising outcomes, while the remaining outcomes have no chance to win. In this case it must be that sum_i{p_i} < 1 and sum_i{beta_i} < 1.

Application to the stock market

Consider a market with n correlated stocks S_k with stochastic returns r_kk= 1,...,n and a riskless bond with return r. An investor puts a fraction u_k of his capital in S_k and the rest is invested in bond. Without loss of generality assume that investor’s starting capital is equal to 1. According to Kelly criterion one should maximize mathbb{E}left[ lnleft((1 + r) + sumlimits_{k=1}^n  u_k(r_k -r) right) right]
Expanding it to the Taylor series around vec{u_0} = (0, ldots ,0) we obtain
mathbb{E} left[ ln(1+r) + sumlimits_{k=1}^{n} frac{u_k(r_k - r)}{1+r} -<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />frac{1}{2}sumlimits_{k=1}^{n}sumlimits_{j=1}^{n} u_k u_j frac{(r_k<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />-r)(r_j - r)}{(1+r)^2} right]
Thus we reduce the optimization problem to the Quadratic programming and the unconstrained solution is <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />vec{u^{star}} = (1+r) (  widehat{Sigma} )^{-1} ( widehat{vec{r}}  )<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
where widehat{vec{r}} and widehat{Sigma} are the vector of means and the matrix of second mixed noncentral moments of the excess returns.[14] There are also numerical algorithms for the fractional Kelly strategies and for the optimal solution under no leverage and no short selling constraints.

Via: csinvesting.org

HFA Padded

The post above is drafted by the collaboration of the Hedge Fund Alpha Team.