set
of optimal outcomes is not empty then the optimal fraction
to bet on k-th outcome may be calculated from this formula:
.
One may prove[13] that
where the right hand-side is the reserve rate[clarification needed]. Therefore the requirement
may be interpreted[13] as follows: k-th outcome is included in the set
of optimal outcomes if and only if its expected revenue rate is greater than the reserve rate. The formula for the optimal fraction
may be interpreted as the excess of the expected revenue rate of k-th horse over the reserve rate divided by the revenue after deduction of the track take when k-th horse wins or as the excess of the probability of k-th horse winning over the reserve rate divided by revenue after deduction of the track take when k-th horse wins. The binary growth exponent is
and the doubling time is
This method of selection of optimal bets may be applied also when probabilities
are known only for several most promising outcomes, while the remaining outcomes have no chance to win. In this case it must be that
and
.
Application to the stock market
Consider a market with
correlated stocks
with stochastic returns
,
and a riskless bond with return
. An investor puts a fraction
of his capital in
and the rest is invested in bond. Without loss of generality assume that investor’s starting capital is equal to 1. According to Kelly criterion one should maximize ![Kelly Formula and Weighting Investments [ANALYSIS] 20 mathbb{E}left[ lnleft((1 + r) + sumlimits_{k=1}^n u_k(r_k -r) right) right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/6/d/e/6de30ae99c1da27e27e4ab92c95f7f79.png)
Expanding it to the Taylor series around
we obtain
![Kelly Formula and Weighting Investments [ANALYSIS] 22 mathbb{E} left[ ln(1+r) + sumlimits_{k=1}^{n} frac{u_k(r_k - r)}{1+r} -<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />frac{1}{2}sumlimits_{k=1}^{n}sumlimits_{j=1}^{n} u_k u_j frac{(r_k<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />-r)(r_j - r)}{(1+r)^2} right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/1/c/b1c2b08db45957bd88b0bdc60a5cb56c.png)
Thus we reduce the optimization problem to the Quadratic programming and the unconstrained solution is ![Kelly Formula and Weighting Investments [ANALYSIS] 23 <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />vec{u^{star}} = (1+r) ( widehat{Sigma} )^{-1} ( widehat{vec{r}} )<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/6/f/3/6f3f912ae030ce36fea1945d4e7e799b.png)
where
and
are the vector of means and the matrix of second mixed noncentral moments of the excess returns.[14] There are also numerical algorithms for the fractional Kelly strategies and for the optimal solution under no leverage and no short selling constraints.
Via: csinvesting.org

![Kelly Formula and Weighting Investments [ANALYSIS] 4 R(S^o)=1-sum_{i in S^o}{f^o_i}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/7/d/b7de19625557ebeee328481c5645f761.png)
![Kelly Formula and Weighting Investments [ANALYSIS] 8 G^o=sum_{i in S}{p_ilog_2{(er_i)}}+(1-sum_{i in S}{p_i})log_2{(R(S^o))} ,](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/3/4/0/34015322e88bf1ed32233f3502b3387f.png)
![Kelly Formula and Weighting Investments [ANALYSIS] 9 T_d=frac{1}{G^o}.](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/0/1/901105a315c7fbcd3d8bee15795de2bf.png)
