HFA Icon

New Study Says SEC Revolving Door Does Not Impact Prosecutions

HFA Padded
Mark Melin
Published on
Updated on
Sign up for our E-mail List and Get FREE Access to Exclusive Investment E-books and More!

*A new academic study considering the potential of a “revolving door” at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) influencing outcomes indicates that no such evidence exists, based on its limited data set.

SEC revolving door incentives do not appear to undermine the prosecution

When considering accounting misrepresentations and civil trials, the study says that “revolving door incentives do not appear to undermine the prosecution of civil cases against accounting misrepresentations.”

SEC

Revolving doors result in regulated firms hiring lawyers from the ranks of their regulators and regulators, in turn, hiring from the ranks of lawyers who battle against them.

Calling revolving doors “natural,” the report advances the argument that the SEC needs industry...

Login required to continue reading.

Setup a free account to get access to this article (no credit card required).

View Full Article
Already a member? Log in here
HFA Padded

Mark Melin is an alternative investment practitioner whose specialty is recognizing the impact of beta market environment on a technical trading strategy. A portfolio and industry consultant, wrote or edited three books including High Performance Managed Futures (Wiley 2010) and The Chicago Board of Trade’s Handbook of Futures and Options (McGraw-Hill 2008) and taught a course at Northwestern University's executive education program.