HFA Icon

Bernstein: Death of 60:40 Portfolio Allocation Upon Us

HFA Padded
Mark Melin
Published on
Updated on
Sign up for our E-mail List and Get FREE Access to Exclusive Investment E-books and More!

For several decades, as bond prices have trended cyclically higher, a common “diversified” portfolio was a 60% allocation to stocks and a 40% allocation to bonds. With US interest rates at historic lows – and bond prices at all-time highs – Bernstein answers “three big questions,” among them: “Is 60:40 dead?”. In brief, the answer is that 60:40 Portfolio Allocation is dead.

60:40 Portfolio Allocation

Goodbye 60:40 Portfolio Allocation

The answer is yes, the traditional asset allocation method towards stocks and bonds is finished. Bernstein analyst Inigo Fraser-Jenkins, in a June 28 report, recognizes the jarring significance of the move.

“The idea of asset allocation starting from a position of 60% equities and 40% bonds...

Login required to continue reading.

Setup a free account to get access to this article (no credit card required).

View Full Article
Already a member? Log in here
HFA Padded

Mark Melin is an alternative investment practitioner whose specialty is recognizing the impact of beta market environment on a technical trading strategy. A portfolio and industry consultant, wrote or edited three books including High Performance Managed Futures (Wiley 2010) and The Chicago Board of Trade’s Handbook of Futures and Options (McGraw-Hill 2008) and taught a course at Northwestern University's executive education program.