HFA Icon

Kelly Formula and Weighting Investments [ANALYSIS]

HFA Padded
HFA Staff
Published on
Sign up for our E-mail List and Get FREE Access to Exclusive Investment E-books and More!

set S^o of optimal outcomes is not empty then the optimal fraction F^o_K to bet on k-th outcome may be calculated from this formula: F^o_K=Frac{Er_K - R(S^o)}{Frac{D}{Beta_K}}=P_K-Frac{R(S^o)}{Frac{D}{Beta_K}}.

One may prove[13] that

R(S^o)=1-Sum_{I In S^o}{F^o_I}

where the right hand-side is the reserve rate[clarification needed]. Therefore the requirement Er_K=Frac{D}{Beta_K}P_K ≫ R(S) may be interpreted[13] as follows: k-th outcome is included in the set S^o of optimal outcomes if and only if its expected revenue rate is greater than the reserve rate. The formula for the optimal fraction F^o_K may be interpreted as the excess of the expected revenue rate of k-th horse over the reserve rate divided by the revenue after deduction of the track take when k-th horse wins or as the excess of the probability of k-th horse winning over the reserve rate divided by revenue after deduction of the track take when k-th horse wins. The binary growth exponent is

G^o=Sum_{I In S}{P_Ilog_2{(Er_I)}}+(1-Sum_{I In S}{P_I})Log_2{(R(S^o))} ,

and the doubling time is

T_D=Frac{1}{G^o}.

This method of selection of optimal bets may be applied also when probabilities P_K are known only for several most promising outcomes, while the remaining outcomes have no chance to win. In this case it must be that Sum_I{P_I} ≪ 1 and Sum_I{Beta_I} ≪ 1.

Application to the stock market

Consider a market with N correlated stocks S_K with stochastic returns R_KK= 1,...,N and a riskless bond with return R. An investor puts a fraction U_K of his capital in S_K and the rest is invested in bond. Without loss of generality assume that investor’s starting capital is equal to 1. According to Kelly criterion one should maximize Mathbb{E}Left[ Lnleft((1 + R) + Sumlimits_{K=1}^N  U_K(R_K -R) Right) Right]
Expanding it to the Taylor series around Vec{U_0} = (0, Ldots ,0) we obtain
Mathbb{E} Left[ Ln(1+R) + Sumlimits_{K=1}^{N} Frac{U_K(R_K - R)}{1+R} -≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫Frac{1}{2}Sumlimits_{K=1}^{N}Sumlimits_{J=1}^{N} U_K U_J Frac{(R_K≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫-R)(R_J - R)}{(1+R)^2} Right]
Thus we reduce the optimization problem to the Quadratic programming and the unconstrained solution is ≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫Vec{U^{Star}} = (1+R) (  Widehat{Sigma} )^{-1} ( Widehat{Vec{R}}  )≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫≪Br /≫
where Widehat{Vec{R}} and Widehat{Sigma} are the vector of means and the matrix of second mixed noncentral moments of the excess returns.[14] There are also numerical algorithms for the fractional Kelly strategies and for the optimal solution under no leverage and no short selling constraints.

Via: csinvesting.org

HFA Padded

The post above is drafted by the collaboration of the Hedge Fund Alpha Team.