Stanphyl Capital January 2024 Commentary

HFA Padded
HFA Staff
Published on
Updated on

Stanphyl Capital commentary for the month ended January 31, 2024.

Friends and Fellow Investors:

For January 2024 and year to date the fund was up approximately 15.6% net of all fees and expenses. By way of comparison, the S&P 500 was up 1.7% and the Russell 2000 was down 3.9%. Since inception on June 1, 2011 the fund is up approximately 155.7% net while the S&P 500 is up 360.7% and the Russell 2000 is up 173.1%. Since inception the fund has compounded at approximately 7.7% net annually vs. 12.8% for the S&P 500 and 8.3% for the Russell 2000.  (The S&P and Russell performances are based on their “Total Returns” indices which include reinvested dividends. Investors will receive exact performance figures from the outside administrator within a week or two. Please note that individual partners’ returns will vary in accordance with their high-water marks.)

Q4 2023 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

This month our large Tesla short position worked nicely as the stock finally began reflecting the fact that its growth story is as dead as its batteries in a Chicago winter. I believe there’s over 80% downside still to come in that stock and write plenty more about that later in this letter. Also this month, our largest long position, Volkswagen, was up nicely as the market finally seems to be recognizing its great value (discussed later in this letter); additionally, today it announced the founding of an AI lab. (Yes, this deep-value fund is apparently now long “an AI stock”!)

Meanwhile, the recession that I (and many leading indicators) predicted hasn’t yet arrived, and thus our large SPY short position continues to hurt us (despite today’s post-Fed meeting slide). However, not yet arriving isn’t the same as not arriving, and I strongly believe that a recession will appear in the first half of this year and the expensive stock market will suffer severely from it.

The consensus is now for either “no landing” or a “soft landing,” yet before even the worst recessions the consensus is nearly always for a “soft landing”; for example, here’s just one headline of many from 2007:

IMF Survey Soft Landing Ahead for US Economy

In fact, for reasons I clearly lay out below, I still strongly believe that the U.S. economy is headed for a hard landing. Meanwhile, the stock market has been rallying fiercely in response to the lessening inflation which is a natural predecessor of the hard landing I expect! So now despite myriad lurking dangers—both economic and geopolitical—the market is now extremely overbought and investor sentiment is quite bullish.

Here’s a chart that perfectly captures the stock market’s current decoupling from “reality”…

Truck Tonnage Index vs S&P 500 Index

And here are a couple that reflect how oblivious the bulls are to that reality…

What Direction Do AAII Members Feel The Stock Market Will Be In The Next 6 Months

Fear And Greed Index

Why do I believe so strongly that we face a “hard landing”? For the same reasons I’ve been stating for a while:

There’s no way an “everything bubble” built on over a decade of 0% interest rates and trillions of dollars of worldwide “quantitative easing” can not implode when confronted with 5% rates and $95 billion/month in U.S. quantitative tightening plus tighter money from the ECB, BOJ and other central banks.

Contrary to the belief of equity bulls with short memories, when an asset bubble unwinds, lower inflation and lower interest rates don’t immediately ride to the rescue. When the 2000 bubble burst and the Nasdaq was down 83% through its 2002 low and the S&P 500 was down 50%, the rates of CPI inflation were just 3.4% in 2000, 2.8% in 2001 and 1.6% in 2002, and the Fed was cutting rates almost the entire time.

Yes, a nasty recession has been delayed due to a combination of “interest rate lag effects,” leftover “Covid cash” (which the San Francisco Fed now believes will last partly into 2024), and consumers loading up on credit card debt, but a hard landing will soon arrive for the following reasons:

Manufacturing PMI

LEI for the US

Keep in mind that even with the Fed now “on hold” with modest anticipated rate cuts in 2024, current stock market index valuations are unsustainable, as stocks are still expensive. According to Standard & Poor’s, Q4 2023 annualized run-rate operating earnings for the S&P 500 are currently estimated to be around $211. A 16x multiple on those earnings (generous for the current environment) would put that index at only around 3376 vs. its January close of 4845, while 15x would put it at around 3165. And those Q4 earnings occurred during a quarter of strong growth, so lower earnings in future quarters are quite possible. Also, just as in bull markets PE multiples usually overshoot to the upside, in bear markets they often overshoot to the downside. Thus, a bottom formed at a lower multiple of lower earnings is not unfathomable.

Meanwhile, although the high current year-over-year inflation rates of 3.9% core CPI and 2.9% core PCE are slowly trending down, I believe we’re in for a new core “inflation floor” of around 3% as the U.S. government racks up massive deficits while substantial wage increases continue.  In fact, because of this Fed’s “dovish tendencies” despite those underlying inflation pressures, the fund now holds a modest amount of gold (via the GLD ETF).

Here then is some commentary on some of our additional positions; please note that we may add to or reduce them at any time…

We continue to own Volkswagen AG (via its VWAPY ADR, which represent “preference shares” that are identical to “ordinary” shares except they lack voting rights and thus sell at a discount). In January VW reported solid 2023 delivery results (+12% vs. 2022), and currently sells for only around 4x its 2024 earnings estimate while controlling a massive number of terrific brands including Porsche, of which it owns 75% at a current market cap (for Porsche) of €72 billion, thus making VW’s €54 billion stake alone worth only around €6 billion less than the entire €60 billion market cap of VW; in other words, at current prices you’re paying just €6 billion to own all these other brands:

EV Brands

I believe Audi alone is worth around €40 billion and the entire company is worth around €150 billion; additionally, the stock yields nearly 8% and VW has a wide range of electric cars available and in development as demand (or regulatory requirements) for them develops.

We continue to own a small position in Fuel Tech Inc. (FTEK), a seller of air and water pollution control technologies, which in November reported a ­­­decent Q3, with revenue, gross margin and operating income all roughly flat year-over-year, at $8 million, 45% and $133,000 respectively. Management reiterated that 2023 revenue will be up slightly vs. 2022, at around $27 million. Meanwhile, at a current price of $1.07/share with 30.4 million shares outstanding and $33.2 million in cash and Treasuries (and no debt), Fuel Tech is selling for an enterprise value of approximately zero. This is the kind of company that will either ignite growth and its stock will climb higher (as its core fossil-fuel pollution treatment business is in a long-term, government-mandated decline, its new “Dissolved Gas Infusion” water treatment is the potential medium-term catalyst for that), or it’s cheap enough to make a good strategic acquisition target, as removing the costs of being an independent public company could make it instantly earnings-accretive while allowing the buyer to acquire a nice chunk of revenue cheaply. The risk here is that if there’s no acquisition and the water treatment business (which announced promising test data in the Q3 earnings release) doesn’t pan out, Fuel Tech will become what Buffett might have called “a cigar butt business with just a few puffs left in it” (albeit pollution-controlled puffs). Thus, this should be a very small position in anyone’s portfolio, as it is in ours.

And now, Tesla…

In January Tesla reported Q4 2023 non-GAAP earnings of .71/share. The implications of this can be summarized in four simple Tweets plus a slide from Bernstein:

JC Oviedo Tweet

Stanphyl Tweet

Stanphyl Tweet

Stanphyl Tweet

Tesla Margins vs US and Europe OEMs

And on top of Tesla’s rapidly declining business model it also has a massive “fraud kicker”…

In 2019 Elon Musk claimed that the hardware in then-current Teslas (and every subsequent Tesla) would soon receive software to make them hugely profitable “robotaxis.” As far back as January 2016 he claimed that every new Tesla had all the hardware needed to be completely self-driving and would receive the necessary software by 2018, and he “demonstrated” this with a completely fraudulent promotional video. Yet here we are in 2024 and the NHTSA recently forced Tesla to make its cars less self-driving via an upgrade of its driver monitoring system (an action safety experts say was highly inadequate, making more severe restrictions likely). This has been a huge consumer fraud and may be a basis for millions of people to sue Tesla for billions of dollars, while negatively impacting Tesla’s current and future sales via negative publicity that has turned its so called “Autopilot” and “Full Self Driving” into laughingstocks. In 2022 Musk said that without self-driving, Tesla stock is basically worthless; needless to say, I agree with him.

On top of Tesla’s massive “self-driving” fraud, in December Reuters published a huge exposé of Tesla’s deadly and financially fraudulent multi-year cover-up of defective suspensions (providing yet more evidence of both Musk’s sociopathology and Tesla’s fraudulently low warranty reserve), thereby causing two U.S. Senators to demand a massive recall and, possibly related to those defective suspensions, in December it was revealed that Teslas crash more than any other brand of car.

Now let’s put these massive safety deceptions and cover-ups into context: as bad as Tesla’s public financials are lately, how much worse might they be “in reality”? I mean, why would anyone trust financial statements from a guy who’s been caught lying and covering-up deadly safety defects multiple times over the years and cycles through CFOs the way McDonald’s cycles through Gen Z fast-food workers?

In fact, in August Tesla’s most-recent CFO suddenly quit (or was fired) on no notice, the latest in a series of sudden and unexplained Tesla CFO departures. This may be tied into the possibility that the DOJ is close to criminally indicting Elon Musk following the revelation of a massive & systemic Musk-directed consumer fraud regarding the range of Tesla’s cars, his alleged attempted theft of company assets to build himself a house, and, in addition to the above-mentioned Reuters story, Handelsblatt’s story about a massive & systemic Tesla safety cover-up while people continue to die in (or because of) Teslas at an astounding pace. In fact, Tesla’s 2024 10-K confirmed that the company has received multiple subpoenas regarding many transgressions. Whether from these crimes or something else, Musk will go down because fraudsters like him always do… even if he thinks he has an “airtight strategy” (blackmail?) to combat these regulators:

Elon Musk Tweet

As for Tesla’s latest hype story, “AI,” the three top leaders of that team left the company in October… I’m sure things there are going great!

Meanwhile, Tesla will soon open its U.S. charging stations to cars from most other manufacturers which, in turn, will adopt Tesla’s connector and charging protocol. (Those competitors are building their own networks, too.) Seeing as many people only buy a Tesla instead of a competing EV in order to access those chargers, and seeing as all the competing charging networks will also adopt this protocol while paying Tesla nothing (Tesla open-sourced it), this will cost Tesla far more in lost auto sale profits than the pennies per share it may gain from charging profits.

And Tesla has objectively lost its “product edge,” with many competing cars now offering comparable or better real-world range, better interiors, faster charging speeds and much better quality. In fact, Tesla ranks near the bottom of the 2023 JD Power survey and its Model 3 is the worst car (out of 111!) in Germany’s rigid safety inspection system!

JD Power Initial Quality Study

And oh, the fraudulently promoted “Cybertruck” Tesla first previewed in 2019 won’t be much of a “growth engine” either, as by the time it might be in meaningful mass-production in late-2024 that grotesque-looking kluge will enter a dogfight of a market vs. Ford’s F-150 Lightning, GM’s electric Silverado, the Dodge Ram REV and Rivian’s R1T.

Another favorite Tesla hype story has been built around so-called “proprietary battery technology.” In fact though, Tesla has nothing proprietary there—it buys the vast majority of its cells from Panasonic, CATL and LG (while the “4680s” it’s trying make itself are a manufacturing disaster with no meaningful advantage in energy density vs. the older “2170s” at the pack level), and the real-world range of its cars is now just average vs. its competitors. And even if Tesla does wind up successfully making some 4680 cells of its own, other manufacturers will gladly make and sell them to anyone, and BMW has already announced it will buy them from CATL and EVE.

As for January’s court ruling rescinding Musk’s massive pay package, I consider that to be no more than “a sideshow” unless it angers him so much that he leaves the company and dumps his remaining stock (admittedly, a possibility), in which case TSLA shares would plunge.

Meanwhile, here is Tesla’s competition in cars…

(note: these links are updated regularly)

And in China…

Here’s Tesla’s competition in autonomous driving; the independents all have deals with major OEMs…

Here’s where Tesla’s competition will get its battery cells…

And here’s Tesla’s competition in storage batteries…

Thanks,

Mark Spiegel

Stanphyl Capital

HFA Padded

The post above is drafted by the collaboration of the Hedge Fund Alpha Team.