HFA Icon

Supreme Court Upholds EMH In Halliburton Ruling

HFA Padded
Published on
Updated on
Sign up for our E-mail List and Get FREE Access to Exclusive Investment E-books and More!

The US Supreme Court reaffirmed the ‘fraud-on-the-market’ theory into today’s ruling on the Halliburton v. Erica P John Fund, affirming its support for a moderate form of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH). While this ruling kept the standards established in Basic Inc V. Levinson in place, it made an important procedural change that will help corporations defend themselves against class action lawsuits.

Supreme Court Upholds Emh In Halliburton Ruling

Fraud-on-the-market relies on EMH to demonstrate reliance

In order for investors to recover damages for securities fraud, they have to show that they relied on the fraudulent information when buying the stock.

“In Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U....

Login required to continue reading.

Setup a free account to get access to this article (no credit card required).

View Full Article
Already a member? Log in here
HFA Padded