HFA Icon

More Trouble For James Fishback: Collins’ Eligibility Lawsuit Seeks to Block His Florida Governor Run

Jacob Wolinsky
Jacob Wolinsky
Published on
David Einhorn Greenlight Capital
Sign up for our E-mail List and Get FREE Access to Exclusive Investment E-books and More!

The departure of a low-level analyst from a top-name hedge fund is usually a quiet affair: a polite resignation, a negotiated garden leave, possibly a non-compete dispute settled quietly in arbitration. However, the saga of James T. Fishback and David Einhorn’s Greenlight Capital has become something of a tragic comedy, devolving from a dispute over intellectual property into a legal war with a clear loser, James Fishback.

What began in the Southern District of New York as a battle over trade secrets and the audacious (and fabricated) title of “Head of Macro” has now migrated to the Northern District of Florida and national news.

Update (June 30, 2026): Now Someone Wants Him Off the Ballot

The Greenlight money fight is no longer Fishback’s only legal headache ($1.5 million owed). On June 29, 2026, Lt. Gov. Jay Collins, one of his rivals for the Republican nomination for Florida governor, went to a Leon County court to try to knock him out of the race. Collins’ argument rests on one line in the Florida Constitution: to be governor, you have to have lived in the state for the seven years before the election. He says Fishback’s own records show he cannot meet it.

Most of the evidence comes from Washington, D.C. The complaint says Fishback registered to vote in D.C. in 2020, voted there in that year’s presidential election, bought a home in the District in 2021, signed mortgage paperwork calling it his principal residence, and took a D.C. homestead deduction on it. Collins named Secretary of State Cord Byrd as the defendant, with Fishback as the real party in interest, and he asked for a fast hearing: a ruling that Fishback is ineligible, his name struck from the ballot, and, if the ballots are already printed, a notice that votes for him will not count. The primary is August 18; the general election is November 3.

Fishback called the whole thing baseless. He posted a 2016 Florida driver’s license with a Davie, Florida address, said the D.C. property is a small apartment where his sister lives, and argued that owning a place in another state does not bar anyone from running.

Here is the part that ties back to everything below. In the Greenlight collection fight, Fishback has been leaning on Florida’s homestead protection, the rule that keeps a primary residence out of a creditor’s reach, and he has made a point of telling that court Madison, Florida is home. Now a political opponent is reaching for the other half of his paper trail, the D.C. mortgage and the D.C. homestead deduction, to argue he has really been living up north. The same residency question pays off for him one way against Greenlight and cuts against him in the governor’s race.

James Fishback'S Florida Versus Washington D.c. Residency Claims At The Center Of His Florida Governor Eligibility Lawsuit

Greenlight, meanwhile, keeps pulling on threads

While that plays out, the collection case kept moving through June, and the new filings do not make Fishback look good. On June 8, Magistrate Judge Martin Fitzpatrick gave him until June 18 to account for four things Greenlight says he still has not explained: a Cartier watch he bought from Bucherer for $7,473 in June 2025, his 2023 Tesla Model 3, his R.J. O’Brien brokerage account, and his Bank of America account. The judge was not impressed with Greenlight’s tactics either, calling its habit of filing one motion to compel after another “expediency rather than efficiency.”

Four days later, Greenlight filed a motion to untangle two companies that keep getting mixed up. They sound almost identical, which is the problem:

  • Azoria Partners LLC is a Florida company Fishback formed in October 2023. He is the registered agent, the manager, and the sole owner, and its registered address is the same Madison, Florida house. A court charging order covers this entity.
  • Azoria Capital, Inc. is a separate Delaware corporation set up in November 2024, run out of Delaware and Washington, D.C., where Fishback is CEO and majority shareholder per a January 2026 SEC filing.

The charging order, the one tied to the loan judgment, requires that any money Azoria Partners LLC pays to Fishback or on his behalf go to Greenlight instead. Greenlight says that has not happened. It told the court the LLC has moved more than $35,000 to or for Fishback since the order, even as he reported a net worth of $530,000 on his 2025 state financial disclosure. The receipts it pointed to are mortgage statements: the $1,884.45 monthly payment on his Washington, D.C. condo was being drafted straight out of the Azoria Partners account, not handed over to Greenlight.

On June 16, the judge cleaned up the confusion in Greenlight’s favor. He vacated an earlier ruling that had wrongly treated the two Azoria companies as one, and reopened the older motion to compel. Fishback now has two clocks running, June 18 and June 30, to respond, or the court can rule against him by default.

One small detail from the file is almost too on the nose. When Greenlight first told the court Fishback had gone quiet, his reply turned out to be sitting in the law firm’s spam quarantine. He had written back on June 1. He just had not sent a single document.

Update (June 23, 2026): The Fee Ruling Lands – Fishback Owes $1.3 Million

Since this piece first ran, the separate Southern District of New York confidentiality case reached its end. On June 23, 2026, U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer ordered Fishback to pay Greenlight $1,198,464.02 in attorney’s fees and $120,052.01 in costs, about $1.32 million combined, for breaching the confidentiality terms of his Greenlight employment agreement (Greenlight Capital, Inc. v. Fishback, No. 1:24-cv-04832). Greenlight had asked for $1,747,626.75 in fees and $120,176.51 in costs. The judge trimmed the bill but granted most of it. The full breakdown is near the bottom of this article.

David Einhorn’s Greenlight Makes New Hires; Says DOGE Was Last Chance To Avert Crisis [Q2 Letter]

Note: I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice, but I have examined many of the court filings from several lawsuits in Greenlight Capital, Inc. v. James Fishback (those documents can be found below and on our site). Additionally, this piece has nothing to do with Fishback’s politics. In fact, I agree (or did before he took on a more radical tone lately – likely for grifting purposes, in my opinion) with Fishback. I became interested in the story because Fishback seemed to be generating publicity for his own demise, and it is so rare for something like this to happen with someone who worked at a big-name hedge fund.

Drawing primarily from the newly surfaced filing Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Compliance with Post-Judgment Discovery) and related garnishment records, we look at the current state of the high-profile lawsuit. A debtor who is publicly suing the Federal Reserve for transparency, is privately engaged in a game of hide-and-seek with David Einhorn over tax returns, brokerage statements, and a frozen bank account containing exactly $5,061.07. Oh and he is now running for Governor of Florida.

`Infographic: What James Fishback Owes Greenlight Capital — $1,198,464 In Fees And $120,052 In Costs Plus A $228,988 Loan-Note Judgment, About $1.55 Million Total
Breakdown Of Everything James Fishback Owes As Of June 22Nd 2026

While this article is over 3,000 words, we have not analyzed all the issues plaguing Fishback. For example, he launched an ETF. In a rare move, the Trustees quickly shut down the ETF due to concerns over his conduct; Fishback claims the move was political.

An independent investigative journalist, Jordan Schachtel, has done some excellent reporting on the Fishback saga, noting that Fishback never filed tax returns one year and has been on a spending spree despite the lien on his assets.

Schachtel notes:

His Tesla was just repo’d by the U.S. Marshals and he still owes over 200k in civil penalties. Now a new court filing offers more detail into his efforts to run from the law. Despite telling a federal judge that he “does not have the means” to pay his debts, Fishback has been on a shopping spree, buying $37k in luxury brand accessories with his Chase card in violation of a court order.

Furthermore, Schachtel states:

While hiding from U.S. Marshals attempts to repossess his assets (though they did find his Tesla, which he had stashed at his friend’s home), Fishback did not disclose that he has another bank account that he has used to purchase luxury clothing items and accessories with a Chase debit card. I assume he can’t acquire a credit card because his credit score is in the toilet. According to bank statements released by federal court: -In June, Fishback bought a $7473 watch from Bucherer. -He has spent thousands at Nordstrom -He spent thousands in one day at Burberry and Brunello Cucinelli -Spent thousands at Tom Ford.

The story is so bizarre the only comparison I can think of is that of Jacob Wohl, whom we first exposed around 10 years ago for securities shenanigans. Wohl later became famous for strange political acts, including his attempt to frame the director of the FBI.

Login required to continue reading.

Setup a free account to get access to this article (no credit card required).

View Full Article
Already a member? Log in here
Jacob Wolinsky

Jacob Wolinsky is the ex-Founder of Valuewalk.com (founded 2011, sold 2023). He is founder of HedgeFundAlpha (formerly ValueWalk Premium), a hedge fund focused intelligence service for institutional investors. Prior to founding Valuewalk, Jacob covered small caps, worked recruiting members for a large hedge fund community and freelance financial journalism. Jacob lives with his wife and six kids in Passaic Park NJ. - Email: jacob(at)hedgefundalpha.com. For confidential inquires email me for my Signal ID. Other methods of secure communication are also available. FD: Most of my portfolio is in I mostly purchase broad-based ETFs, mutual funds or individual bonds - I do this for performance reasons and to avoid any potential conflict of interest or occasional receipt of insider information. I will disclose if I have a stake in any company, but in general I have few stocks and I avoid any trading especially around topics I am covering.